.png)
Complete visibility into time & dollars spent
Create meaningful reports and dashboards
Set targets and get notified of delivery risks
Track and forecast all deliverables
Create and share developer surveys
Align and track development costs
Yeah, I thought so.
I've been doing this for 40 years. Leading teams for 37. Running the whole show for 30. I've had orgs with 800 people, and here's what nobody wants to admit: Most teams are measuring everything except what actually matters.
Here's the thing about humans - we optimize for whatever you measure us on. Give me 25 KPIs to hit? I'll probably hit none of them well. Give me 2 or 3 that actually matter - speed, focus, quality? Now we're talking.
Let's get real about velocity for a second. You're hitting 30-35 story points every sprint. Great! Are you actually shipping value? Are your customers happy? Is your production environment on fire?
Velocity hides so much garbage. It's like saying "I drove 100 miles today!" Yeah, but were you going in circles?
When your software breaks and you have to drop everything to fix it, you're not just standing still - you're going backwards. But hey, at least your velocity and burndown charts looked good last sprint, right?
Want to know the most brutal moment in my career? Sitting in a budget review and having the CEO ask:
"Why is this project three months late and what are you doing about it?"
Not "tell me about your sprint velocity." Not "how's your test coverage?" Just pure, unfiltered: Why can't you deliver what you promised?
That's not just about missed deadlines. That's about trust. When you're the engineering leader and your peers in sales, marketing, and ops don't trust you to deliver - you're done. And throwing technical jargon at them just makes it worse.
After four decades of doing this, here's my dead-simple framework:
Focus: Are you actually working on what you said you'd work on? Not the drive-by requests. Not the "hey, can you just quickly look at this?" If you say yes to everything, you're saying no to what matters.
Quality: Because shipping fast garbage isn't shipping - it's creating future emergencies. Every bug in production is a step backwards, not forwards.
Speed: But the right kind. Cycle time from commit to deploy. Not story points. Not lines of code. (Please, for the love of all that is holy, stop counting lines of code.)
Here's exactly how I run engineering orgs now:
Look, I've seen every major shift in software - Windows, the web, mobile, cloud. AI is up there with the internet in terms of game-changing impact.
But here's what everyone's missing: AI accelerates everything, including your bugs. AI doesn't magically make bad engineers good. It makes fast engineers faster - for better or worse.
I'm watching teams ship AI-generated code without proper review because "the AI wrote it, so it must be good." That's not just naive - it's dangerous. Your customers don't care if a bug was written by a human or GPT-4. They just care that your app is broken.
When I walk into a Sr Exec meeting or budget review, nobody gives a damn about my burndown charts. They want to know four things:
That's it. Everything else is theater.
Every company today runs on software. Every. Single. One. If you're running the engineering org, you have exactly two jobs:
Mess up #1 and nothing else matters. Only do #1 and you're slowly dying. The balance is everything.
Here's my challenge to you: Stop measuring everything that moves. Kill half your dashboards. Cancel half your status meetings.
Instead, answer these questions:
If you can't answer those three questions in under 30 seconds, you're measuring the wrong things.
Stop building reports about building software. Start building software.
The difference between good engineering orgs and great ones? Great ones measure what matters and ignore the rest. Which one are you?